Nagar N. Multidisciplinary closed-loop care for perinatal anxiety and depression: Reflections on a structured intervention model. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(7): 117802 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.117802]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I am highly satisfied with the manuscript submission process, peer review process, and the overall editorial experience provided by the journal. The online submission system is user-friendly, and the peer review reports were constructive, objective, and helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript. The editorial and production processes were efficient, and the published article was presented professionally. I sincerely appreciate the efforts of the Editor, reviewers, and the editorial team in maintaining high academic and publishing standards. It is a privilege to be associated with this journal both as an author and as a reviewer, and I look forward to contributing to the journal in the future.